Download SVG Download DOT Download RDF Download Prolog Download for Rationale (RTNL) Download for Carneades (LKIF)
Evaluate with Toast (ASPIC+) Evaluate with Tweety (DeLP) Evaluate with ArgSemSAT

267243

It is intrinsic.

Supports: 270532

267244

how do we as a society regulate the amount of space that we use for homes, versus other uses?

267261

as we've seen it so far, all it's gone to do really is line the pockets of the developers themselves.

267273

I agree that we have a fundamental problem with the nature of our development industry in this country

267274

is far too predicated on delivering the highest possible returns, first to the landowners and second to developers, with the community

Supports: 267273

Supports: 267275

267275

the people who actually need homes - including the quarter of a million people who are homeless in this country - are very, very distant third in that pecking order.

Supports: 267273

267276

I agree that the development sector needs urgent reform to provide the homes that we actually need, not just profits.

Supports: 267275

267297

So, I would like to bring you back onto this kind of point about our obligation to nature now that we know more.

267307

Firstly, the planning system, I think, does have strong tools for protection nature.

270557

267308

Things like national parks, areas of outstanding national beauty ... these are all outstanding policies for protecting the really really valuable bits of nature ...

Supports: 267307

267310

it's quite damaging.

Supports: 270562

267311

Millions of people commute every day across the greenbelt, twice. That is adding hugely to the carbon impact on ... of the economy,

Supports: 267310

267312

they cannot live close to where the jobs are, because green belt policies insist that we build homes off and on greenfield sites beyond the green belt,

Supports: 267310

267313

then demand that people commute thirty miles into town to work.

Supports: 267310

267314

That cannot be an environmentally sustainable or sensible position.

Supports: 267313

270527

nature needs to be XXX to justify it's worth

270528

Nature needs to justify it's worth

270532

nature does not need to justify it's worth at all.

Attacks: 270528

270540

we are ensuring that the benefits of development are actually going to go to the people that need it by XXX

270557

we know that we don't continue doing the damage that we have so far by XXX

270562

the green belt per say is not a particularly effective way of protecting nature.